DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
SJN
Docket No: 4167-14
11203-0908
8 April 2015
This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request
received on 20 February 2014. You previously petitioned the
Board and were advised in our letter of 12 December 2008, that
your application had been denied.
Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously
examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence
that was not previously considered by the Board, your request
must again be denied. In accordance with the foregoing, your
application is hereby administratively closed.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that the Board will not process any additional reviews and this
matter is’ considered a final action. However, if you wish to
continue to seek relief you will need to present your concerns to
a court of appropriate jurisdiction.
Sincere
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | NR5668 11
the Navy has requested that I respond to your. —: current request for reconsideration of your case. You previously petitioned the Board and were advised in our letter of 29 March 2012, that your application had been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4341 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 SIN Docket No: 4341-14 2829-13 20 April 2015 This is in reference to your latest reconsideration request received on 25 February 2014. Your current request has also been carefully and conscientiously examined. However, given that it does not contain new evidence that was not previously considered by the Board, your request must again be denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07857-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07120-09
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found there was no error or injustice in your discharge from the Naval Reserve in 1955 when you entered the Naval Academy. While at the Naval Academy, you were simply not training as a member of the Naval Reserve and not available to be called upon to meet emergencies as a member of the Naval Reserve. In the Board's view, any errors made by prior panels in decisions issued many years ago should not be perpetuated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR6702 15_Redacted
Because your application was submitted with new evidence not previously considered, the Board found it in the interest of justice to review your application. Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 14 August 2015. In your case, the Board determined that a personal appearance was not necessary and considered your case based on the evidence of record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1774 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. The Board carefully considered all of the arguments raised in your application and the evidence your counsel submitted regarding those claims. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09300-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your application asserts, essentially, that you were compelled to elect a 1 June 2007 retirement date vice al August 2007 retirement date due to a hostile environment at your command. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to _ demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00537-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 10 May 2001 you submitted an appeal to The punishment imposed was a On 2 June 2001, your suspended separation action was vacated based on your continued misconduct, however, final action of the separation was held in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01401-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 24 August 1943 and reported to active duty on 23 November 1943. entered a program which, if successfully completed, would have led to a commission in the Navy. There is no evidence in the record, to show that you requested or were promised a commission in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07496-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. concluded that appropriate action was taken to remove the mark of desertion from your record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...